Tim Carter v. Joseph Lindsey Judge Stevens Mrs. Hovell
Tim Carter v. Joseph Lindsey Judge Stevens Mrs. Hovell
Opinion
67 F.3d 294
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tim CARTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Joseph LINDSEY; Judge Stevens; Mrs. Hovell, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-2233.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-465-R)
Tim Carter, appellant pro se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Lindsey, No. CA-95-465-R (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.