Husketh v. Woodard
Husketh v. Woodard
Opinion
67 F.3d 295
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Douglas Lee HUSKETH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Loomis WOODARD, Superintendent; Lieutenant Mitchell,
Employee at Johnston County Correctional Center; Sergeant
Pittman, Employee at Johnston County Correctional Center;
Mr. Hind, Physician's Assistant at Johnston County
Correctional Center; John Doe and John Doe, in their
individual and official capacities; State of North
Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6923.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 21, 1995.
Decided Oct. 4, 1995.
Douglas Lee Husketh, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Husketh v. Woodard, No. CA-94-545-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.