Austen O. Nwanze v. Tepper Brothers Ronald Lewis B & L Properties
Austen O. Nwanze v. Tepper Brothers Ronald Lewis B & L Properties
Opinion
67 F.3d 296
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Austen O. NWANZE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TEPPER BROTHERS; Ronald Lewis; B & L Properties,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-1228.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 6, 1995.
Decided Sept. 22, 1995.
Austen O. Nwanze, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bruce Brown, WELLS, PARIS, BLANK & BROWN, Richmond, Virginia; Robert Henry Smallenberg, AYERS & STOLTE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this diversity action alleging breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nwanze v. Tepper Bros., No. CA-94-33 (E.D.Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.