United States v. Covey Mitchell
United States v. Covey Mitchell
Opinion
67 F.3d 297
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Covey MITCHELL, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 94-7405.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1995.
Covey Mitchell, appellant pro se.
Steven Lawrence Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's "motion for ruling" and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. CA-92-100-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.