U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Thomas R. McClary A/K/A Boo Boo

United States v. Thomas R. McClary A/K/A Boo Boo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 11, 1995
67 F.3d 297; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32424; 1995 WL 538692 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Thomas R. McClary A/K/A Boo Boo

Opinion

67 F.3d 297

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Thomas R. MCCLARY, a/k/a Boo Boo, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 94-6579.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 1995.

Thomas R. McClary, appellant pro se.

Stephen Wiley Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, For appellee.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClary, Nos. CR-89-82; CA-91-453 (E.D.Va. May 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.