U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Ivan Dawkins, A/K/A Dollarhead

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 22, 1995

67 F.3d 297; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32414; 1995 WL 561280 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

67 F.3d 297

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Ivan DAWKINS, a/k/a Dollarhead, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6702.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 29, 1995.
Decided Sept. 22, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-7, CA-95-109-CV-3)

Ivan Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawkins, Nos. CR-93-7; CA-95-109-CV-3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.