Mack Arthur White v. David K. Smith, Warden
Mack Arthur White v. David K. Smith, Warden
Opinion
67 F.3d 298
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mack Arthur WHITE, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent--Appellee.
No. 94-7300.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1995.
Mack Arthur White, appellant pro se.
John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Smith, No. CA-94-320-R (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.