U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Company v. Radiator Specialty Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 31, 1995 · Widener, Hall, Motz

67 F.3d 534; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30980; 1995 WL 637083 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Company appeals an order of the district court requiring it to defend Radiator Specialty Company in twenty-six lawsuits alleging injuries resulting from occupational exposure to asbestos. We have considered the briefs and arguments of the parties, and we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in its cogent memorandum opinion, which we adopt as our own. Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Co. v. Radiator Specialty Co., 862 F.Supp. 1437 (E.D.N.C. 1994), as amended, Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Co. v. Radiator Specialty Co., No. 93-209-CIV-5-D (E.D.N.C., Sept. 19, 1994). *

AFFIRMED.

The September 19 amendment simply corrected an error in the penultimate paragraph of the *535 opinion, substituting “twenty-six” cases for "twenty-five." This correction does not appear in the published version of the opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.