U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Ronald Carmichael v. J.R. Hunt, Superintendent Michael Lamm, Assistant Superintendent William S. Barker, Sergeant Mark Barhill

Ronald Carmichael v. J.R. Hunt, Superintendent Michael Lamm, Assistant Superintendent William S. Barker, Sergeant Mark Barhill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1995
68 F.3d 459; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33848; 1995 WL 612429 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Ronald Carmichael v. J.R. Hunt, Superintendent Michael Lamm, Assistant Superintendent William S. Barker, Sergeant Mark Barhill

Opinion

68 F.3d 459

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J.R. HUNT, Superintendent; Michael Lamm, Assistant
Superintendent; William S. Barker, Sergeant;
Mark Barhill, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7206.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 3, 1995.
Decided Oct. 19, 1995.

Ronald Carmichael, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carmichael v. Hunt, No. CA-95-182-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.