U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Charles T. Cunniff v. Patrick J. Gurney W.P. Rogers D.R. Guillory M. Ornelas

Charles T. Cunniff v. Patrick J. Gurney W.P. Rogers D.R. Guillory M. Ornelas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 13, 1995
68 F.3d 459; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33853; 1995 WL 602348 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Charles T. Cunniff v. Patrick J. Gurney W.P. Rogers D.R. Guillory M. Ornelas

Opinion

68 F.3d 459

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles T. CUNNIFF, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patrick J. GURNEY; W.P. Rogers; D.R. Guillory; M.
Ornelas, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 21, 1995.
Decided: October 13, 1995.

Charles T. Cunniff, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.