U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Steven E. Jones v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 1995

68 F.3d 460; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33863; 1995 WL 619872 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

68 F.3d 460

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven E. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6368.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 12, 1995.
Decided: Oct. 23, 1995.

Steven E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Kimberly Smith Ward, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Smith, No. CA-94-3023-S (D.Md. Feb. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.