U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

William T. McGhee v. Ralph Lowe Mr. Noles, and Mr. High Mr. Williams

William T. McGhee v. Ralph Lowe Mr. Noles, and Mr. High Mr. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 10, 1995
68 F.3d 460; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33884; 1995 WL 595597 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

William T. McGhee v. Ralph Lowe Mr. Noles, and Mr. High Mr. Williams

Opinion

68 F.3d 460

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William T. McGHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph LOWE; Mr. Noles, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Mr. HIGH; Mr. Williams, Defendants.

No. 95-7072.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 21, 1995.
Decided: October 10, 1995.

William T. McGhee, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. McGhee v. Lowe, No. CA-94-172-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1994 and July 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.