United States v. Jerrell Lamar Meadows
United States v. Jerrell Lamar Meadows
Opinion
68 F.3d 462
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jerrell Lamar MEADOWS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6423.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 12, 1995.
Decided: Oct. 23, 1995.
Jerrell Lamar Meadows, Appellant Pro Se.
David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Meadows, Nos. CR-90-310; CA-94-775-7-3AK (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motion to compel production of certain trial and court records
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.