Cordle v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp.
Cordle v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp.
Opinion
69 F.3d 532
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Virginia CORDLE, Widow of Ivan Cordle, Petitioner,
v.
JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 94-2495.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 24, 1995.
Virginia Cordle, Petitioner Pro Se. Ramesh Murthy, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, J. Matthew McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Cordle v. Jewell Ridge Coal Co., No. 92-2364-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.