U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Crayton E. McElveen Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia...

Crayton E. McElveen Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1995
69 F.3d 533; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35637 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Crayton E. McElveen Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia...

Opinion

69 F.3d 533

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Crayton E. MCELVEEN, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; Supreme Court of Virginia;
General Assembly of Virginia; Governor of Virginia;
Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia; The
Council on Human Rights; Board of Education, Director;
Department of Corrections, Director; Augusta Correctional
Center, Warden; John/Jane Doe (unknown persons),
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7075.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1995.

Crayton E. McElveen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's petition for writ of mandamus and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McElveen v. Virginia, No. CA-95-429-AM (E.D. Va. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.