U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Danny K. Smith, United States of America v. Danny K. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 17, 1995

70 F.3d 113 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

70 F.3d 113

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Danny K. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Danny K. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 95-7058, 95-6128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 23, 1995.
Decided Nov. 17, 1995.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-139-N, CA-94-1011-2)

Danny K. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-92-139-N; CA-94-1011-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 2 & Dec. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.