U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. John Arrington

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 15, 1995

70 F.3d 113; 1995 WL 677433 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

70 F.3d 113

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
John ARRINGTON, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7476.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 24, 1995.
Decided Nov. 15, 1995.

John Arrington, Appellant Pro Se.

John Vincent Geise, Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Arrington, No. CR-89-391-JFM; CA-95-1771-JFM (D.Md. July 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.