Bernard v. Santiago
Bernard v. Santiago
Opinion
70 F.3d 1260
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
A. SANTIAGO; D.A. Braxton; Lonnie M. Saunders; Augusta
Correctional Center Adjustment Committee;
Departmental Operating Procedure,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6761.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 1995.
Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.
Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Santiago, No. CA-92-374-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.