Stephen Mark Hause v. W. Gaston Fairey John B. Shupper
Stephen Mark Hause v. W. Gaston Fairey John B. Shupper
Opinion
70 F.3d 1261
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stephen Mark HAUSE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
W. Gaston FAIREY; John B. Shupper, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6286.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 1995.
Stephen Mark Hause, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hause v. Fairey, No. CA-94-2594-3-20AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1995). We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished