U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Riddick v. Whitten

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 4, 1995

70 F.3d 1263; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38708; 1995 WL 709848 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

70 F.3d 1263

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ras Michael Angelo RIDDICK, a/k/a Michael Angelo Riddick,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sylvia R. WHITTEN, Ms.; I. Session, Correctional Officer;
Mecklenburg Correctional Center; Ezel,
Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6348.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1994.
Decided: December 4, 1995.

Ras Michael Angelo Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riddick v. Whitten, No. CA-94-319-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.