U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant

David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 12, 1995
72 F.3d 126; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39545; 1995 WL 737455 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant

Opinion

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David CUFFEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.B. WRIGHT, Jr., Chief Warden; B. Delbridge, Postal
Assistant, et al, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1009-2)

David Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cuffee v. Wright, No. CA-94-1009-2 (E.D. Va. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.