U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Patricia Rae Fruetel v. Us Bureau of Prisons

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 12, 1995

72 F.3d 126; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39548; 1995 WL 736866 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Patricia Rae FRUETEL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
US BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-7246.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-753-2)

Patricia Rae Fruetel, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fruetel v. United States Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-95-753-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.