Martin v. Smith
Martin v. Smith
Opinion
72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry W. MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Fletcher N. SMITH, Jr., Attorney at Law; Lawance W. Crane,
Attorney at Law; Charles B. Patterson, Attorney at Law;
Karl Allen, Attorney at Law; William D. Walsh, Attorney at
Law; Larry R. Patterson, Judge for Greenville County,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7152.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1942-6-0AK)
Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Smith, No. CA-94-1942-6-0AK (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Henry W. Martin, Jr. v. Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law Lawance W. Crane, Attorney at Law Charles B. Patterson, Attorney at Law Karl Allen, Attorney at Law William D. Walsh, Attorney at Law Larry R. Patterson, Judge for Greenville County
- Status
- Published