U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Frankie L. McCoy Sr. v. S. Hutchson, Sergeant Sergeant Jopes M. Thompson, Co Ii, Officer Unknown Named

Frankie L. McCoy Sr. v. S. Hutchson, Sergeant Sergeant Jopes M. Thompson, Co Ii, Officer Unknown Named
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 12, 1995
72 F.3d 127; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39585; 1995 WL 734097 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Frankie L. McCoy Sr. v. S. Hutchson, Sergeant Sergeant Jopes M. Thompson, Co Ii, Officer Unknown Named

Opinion

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Frankie L. McCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
S. HUTCHSON, Sergeant; Sergeant Jopes; M. Thompson, Co II,
Officer; Unknown Named Defendants, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7526.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95-2359-L).

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCoy v. Hutchson, No. CA-95-2359-L (D. Md. Aug. 28, 1995; Sept. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.