Kennedy Williams v. Charlie J. Cepak, Warden Pris MacK Associate Warden, Individually, and in Their Official Capacities
Kennedy Williams v. Charlie J. Cepak, Warden Pris MacK Associate Warden, Individually, and in Their Official Capacities
Opinion
73 F.3d 359
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kennedy WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charlie J. CEPAK, Warden; Pris Mack, Associate Warden,
Individually, and in their official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7224.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 12, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.
Kennedy Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Holly Saleeby Atkins, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Cepak, No. CA-94-3007-6-2AK (D.S.C. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.