U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department

James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 1996
73 F.3d 358; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4178; 1996 WL 2424 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Rodney SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; Cumberland County
Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6994.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided: Jan. 4, 1996.

James Rodney Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Southern Correctional Inst., No. CA-95-247-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.