U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Dennis Howell Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 1996

73 F.3d 359; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4192; 1996 WL 2683 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

73 F.3d 359
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dennis Howell SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6837.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Dennis Howell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-89-136-N; CA-95-361-2 (E.D.Va. May 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.