U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Robert Lee Brock v. Michale Roach, Robert Lee Brock v. Robert T. Garnett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 17, 1996

74 F.3d 1230; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39024 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee BROCK, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michale ROACH, Defendant--Appellee.
Robert Lee BROCK, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Robert T. GARNETT, Defendant--Appellee.

Nos. 95-7377, 95-7400.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1996.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. No. 95-7377, Brock v. Roach, No. CA-95-775-R; No. 95-7400, Brock v. Garnett, No. CA-95-778 (W.D.Va. Aug. 8 & 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.