U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 17, 1996
74 F.3d 1230; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39021; 1996 WL 15455 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections

Opinion

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7202.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-433 (E.D.Va. July 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.