U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Ealey v. Hawley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 17, 1996

74 F.3d 1231; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38833; 1996 WL 15422 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William Thomas EALEY, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Charles HAWLEY; Thomas Breedlove; Jane Doe; John Keku,
Doctor; Doctor Lites; Doctor Baloch; Doctor Smith;
Doctor Daniels; John Doe; Doctor Davenport; Ms. Kelly;
Doctor Shah; V.L. Evans; Percy Davis; Mr. Batten; Lynn
Phillips, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7375.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

William Thomas Ealey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ealey v. Hawley, No. CA-95-490-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.