Vernon Eggelston v. Virginia Correctional Enterprises Department of Corrections Jim Dillon Charlie B. Hudson
Vernon Eggelston v. Virginia Correctional Enterprises Department of Corrections Jim Dillon Charlie B. Hudson
Opinion
74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Vernon EGGELSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
Jim Dillon; Charlie B. Hudson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7574.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 18, 1996.
Vernon Eggelston, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.