U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 17, 1996
74 F.3d 1231; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38832 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant COOK, Defendant-Appellee.
Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry HUFFMAN; L.M. Saunders, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-7429, 95-7460.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Cook, No. CA-95-984-R; Foley v. Huffman, No. CA-95-1013-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 5, 1995; Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.