Robert Chambers v. Kenneth Sutton
Robert Chambers v. Kenneth Sutton
Opinion
74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth SUTTON, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-7537.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided: Jan. 24, 1996.
Robert Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Chambers v. Sutton, No. CA-95-486-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.