U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Elder Deforrorrora Locust v. W. Billy Smith, Sheriff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 1996

74 F.3d 1232; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38857; 1996 WL 23322 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Elder Deforrorrora LOCUST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. Billy SMITH, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-2533.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Elder Deforrorrora Locust, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Locust v. Smith, No. CA-95-38-BO (E.D.N.C. July 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.