Marcus A. Joseph v. R.C. Peterson Nancy Bloom Bill Austin, Individually and in Their Official and Professional Capacities
Marcus A. Joseph v. R.C. Peterson Nancy Bloom Bill Austin, Individually and in Their Official and Professional Capacities
Opinion
74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Marcus A. JOSEPH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
R.C. PETERSON; Nancy Bloom; Bill Austin, individually and
in their official and professional capacities,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-7575.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.
Marcus A. Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Joseph v. Peterson, No. CA-95-2457-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.