U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Russell Marcum, Jr.

United States v. Russell Marcum, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 1996
74 F.3d 1234; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39084; 1996 WL 23198 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Russell Marcum, Jr.

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Russell MARCUM, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6766.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Russell Marcum, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael M. Fisher, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Marcum, Nos. CR-92-154; CA-94-1067-2 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.