United States v. Larry Haywood Hobgood, III
United States v. Larry Haywood Hobgood, III
Opinion
74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Larry Haywood HOBGOOD, III, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-7352.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 26, 1995.
Decided Jan. 18, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-133-F, CA-95-333-CV-F)
Larry Haywood Hobgood, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hobgood, Nos. CR-93-133-F; CA-95-333-CV-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.