United States v. Calvin Scott Wedington
United States v. Calvin Scott Wedington
Opinion
74 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Calvin Scott WEDINGTON, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 95-7384.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996
Decided Jan. 24, 1996
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-82-86, CA-95-2081-K)
Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.
Maury S. Epner, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and requiring Appellant to pay a filing fee on all future 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motions, unless Appellant can show good cause to the contrary. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wedington, Nos. CR-82-86; CA-95-2081-K (D.Md. Aug. 11, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.