William F. Wright v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
William F. Wright v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Opinion
74 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William F. WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-2435.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.
William F. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Sally J. Schornstheimer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the tax court's order dismissing his petition and imposing a penalty under 26 U.S.C. Sec. 6673 (1988) based on the frivolous nature of the allegations raised in his petition. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Wright v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 95-1774 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.