Atkinson v. Evatt
Opinion
76 F.3d 371
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wilson ATKINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of
Corrections; Kenneth D. McKellar, Deputy Regional
Administrator, South Carolina Department of Corrections;
Kenneth Woodington, Employee, Headquarters, South Carolina
Department of Corrections; William H. Davis, Warden, Evans
Correctional Institution; L.J. Allen, Regional
Administrator; William Catoe, Deputy Commissioner of
Operations; Gaston Fairey, Attorney for "Nelson" Decree;
John Shupper, Plaintiff Monitor for "Nelson" Decree,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7327.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided: Feb. 1, 1996.
Wilson Atkinson, Appellant Pro Se.
William Llewellyn Pope, POPE & RODGERS, Columbia, South Carolina; John Christopher Mills, FAIREY, PARISE & MILLS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkinson v. Evatt, No. CA-94-2236-3-19-BC (D.S.C. July 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.