U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Archie Jerome Chadwick v. Archie Gee, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 25, 1996

76 F.3d 371; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6842; 1996 WL 28661 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

76 F.3d 371

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Archie Jerome CHADWICK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Archie GEE, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-7819.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 25, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2174-S)

Archie Jerome Chadwick, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chadwick v. Gee, No. CA-95-2174-S (D.Md. Oct. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.