James D. Haburn, Sr. v. Raeford Mitchell L. Hayes L. Hoy Belinda Long David Stewart E.L. Woodard Willis Adcock
James D. Haburn, Sr. v. Raeford Mitchell L. Hayes L. Hoy Belinda Long David Stewart E.L. Woodard Willis Adcock
Opinion
76 F.3d 372
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James D. HABURN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Raeford MITCHELL; L. Hayes; L. Hoy; Belinda Long; David
Stewart; E.L. Woodard; Willis Adcock,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7346.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 1, 1996.
James D. Haburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haburn v. Mitchell, No. CA-95-614-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.