U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Cunningham v. Thompson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 1996

76 F.3d 372; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6791; 1996 WL 40992 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

76 F.3d 372

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Peter X. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.E. THOMPSON; C. Hester, Assistant Warden; S.L. Batts,
Assistant Warden; S.R. Whitten, Grievance
Coordinator; Doctor Shelton; Doctor
Wray; Nurse Blakely,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7265.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 1, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1042)

Peter X. Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Sandra Morris Holleran, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cunningham v. Thompson, No. CA-94-1042 (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.