David Lester Herbert v. Warden Smith Attorney General of the State of Maryland
David Lester Herbert v. Warden Smith Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Opinion
76 F.3d 373
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Lester HERBERT, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Warden SMITH; Attorney General of The State of Maryland,
Respondents--Appellees.
No. 95-7874.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Decided Jan. 25, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95-3281-MJG)
David Lester Herbert, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Herbert v. Smith, No. CA-95-3281-MJG (D.Md. Nov. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.