U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Willie McCray v. D.R. Nicholson G.K. Ault Lieutenant Feury, and Sheriff's Office Jail Physician

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 1996

76 F.3d 374; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6724; 1996 WL 49276 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

76 F.3d 374

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Willie McCRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
D.R. NICHOLSON; G.K. Ault; Lieutenant Feury, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Sheriff's Office; Jail Physician, Defendants.

No. 95-8523.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 8, 1996.

Willie McCray, Appellant Pro Se.

Brian R.M. Adams, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & RAWLS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Gary Albert Godard, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Nicholson, No. CA-94-1430-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 23 and Nov. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.