U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Turner v. Geise

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 1996

76 F.3d 376; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6682; 1996 WL 40942 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

76 F.3d 376

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mark A. TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
James FARROW; Demetrius Boyd; Terrence Jefferson; Herman
Kinard; Carlos Ferreina, Plaintiffs,
v.
Barner GEISE, Chief Solicitor; Jeffery Bloom, Chief Public
Defender; State of South Carolina; County of
Richland, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7323.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 1, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1829-3-21BC)

Mark A. Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Geise, No. CA-95-1829-3-21BC (D.S.C. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.