United States v. Ricky Jennings Brawley
United States v. Ricky Jennings Brawley
Opinion
76 F.3d 376
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ricky Jennings BRAWLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6728.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 1, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-394, CA-94-509-3-6-AK)
Keith Eric Golden, GOLDEN, MEIZLISH & ELWOOD CO., L.P.A., Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to convert this appeal to a formal briefing track and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brawley, No. CR-90-394; CA-94-509-3-6-AK (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.