Zurla v. Beatty
Zurla v. Beatty
Opinion
76 F.3d 377
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert F. ZURLA, legally deaf person, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ernest BEATTY, individually and as an officer with the Horry
County Police Department; Al Fanshaw; John Mention;
Cheryll M. Watson, caseworker with the Horry County
Department of Social Services, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Horry County Department of Social Services; City of Conway,
Defendants.
No. 95-2726.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Jan. 31, 1996.
Robert F. Zurla, Appellant Pro Se. James Wofford Peterson, Jr., CLARK & JOHNSON, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Zurla v. Beatty, No. CA-93-1374-4-21JI (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.