U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Danny Lamont Yarborough v. J.E. Setzer, Jr., Judge

Danny Lamont Yarborough v. J.E. Setzer, Jr., Judge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 25, 1996
76 F.3d 377; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6660; 1996 WL 27931 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Danny Lamont Yarborough v. J.E. Setzer, Jr., Judge

Opinion

76 F.3d 377

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Danny Lamont YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
J.E. SETZER, Jr., Judge, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-7681.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996
Decided Jan. 25, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-851-5-CT-BO)

Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Setzer, No. CA-95-851-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.