Dwight Williams v. Victor Abernathy, and Gary Dixon James B. Hunt
Dwight Williams v. Victor Abernathy, and Gary Dixon James B. Hunt
Opinion
76 F.3d 377
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dwight WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Victor ABERNATHY, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Gary DIXON; James B. Hunt, Defendants.
No. 95-7822.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 25, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-94-458)
Dwight Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Abernathy, No. CA-94-458 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20 and Oct. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.